Term | Notation Example(s) | We say in English … |
---|---|---|
sequence | \(x_1, \ldots, x_n\) | A sequence \(x_1\) to \(x_n\) |
summation | \(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i\) or \(\displaystyle{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}\) | The sum of the terms of the sequence \(x_1\) to \(x_n\) |
all reals | \(\mathbb{R}\) | The (set of all) real numbers (numbers on the number line) |
all integers | \(\mathbb{Z}\) | The (set of all) integers (whole numbers including negatives, zero, and positives) |
all positive integers | \(\mathbb{Z}^+\) | The (set of all) strictly positive integers |
all natural numbers | \(\mathbb{N}\) | The (set of all) natural numbers. Note: we use the convention that \(0\) is a natural number. |
piecewise rule definition | \(f(x) = \begin{cases} x & \text{if~}x \geq 0 \\ -x & \text{if~}x<0\end{cases}\) | Define \(f\) of \(x\) to be \(x\) when \(x\) is nonnegative and to be \(-x\) when \(x\) is negative |
function application | \(f(7)\) | \(f\) of \(7\) or \(f\) applied to \(7\) or the image of \(7\) under \(f\) |
\(f(z)\) | \(f\) of \(z\) or \(f\) applied to \(z\) or the image of \(z\) under \(f\) | |
\(f(g(z))\) | \(f\) of \(g\) of \(z\) or \(f\) applied to the result of \(g\) applied to \(z\) | |
absolute value | \(\lvert -3 \rvert\) | The absolute value of \(-3\) |
square root | \(\sqrt{9}\) | The non-negative square root of \(9\) |
To define sets:
To define a set using roster method, explicitly list its elements. That is, start with \(\{\) then list elements of the set separated by commas and close with \(\}\).
To define a set using set builder definition, either form “The set of all \(x\) from the universe \(U\) such that \(x\) is ..." by writing \[\{x \in U \mid ...x... \}\] or form “the collection of all outputs of some operation when the input ranges over the universe \(U\)" by writing \[\{ ...x... \mid x\in U \}\]
We use the symbol \(\in\) as “is an
element of” to indicate membership in a set.
Example sets: For each of the following,
identify whether it’s defined using the roster method or set builder
notation and give an example element.
\(\{ -1, 1\}\)
\(\{0, 0 \}\)
\(\{-1, 0, 1 \}\)
\(\{(x,x,x) \mid x \in \{-1,0,1\}
\}\)
\(\{ \}\)
\(\{ x \in \mathbb{Z} \mid x \geq 0
\}\)
\(\{ x \in \mathbb{Z} \mid x > 0
\}\)
\(\{\texttt{A},\texttt{C},\texttt{U},\texttt{G}\}\)
\(\{\texttt{A}\texttt{U}\texttt{G},
\texttt{U}\texttt{A}\texttt{G}, \texttt{U}\texttt{G}\texttt{A},
\texttt{U}\texttt{A}\texttt{A}\}\)
For a set of numbers \(X\), how do you formalize “there is a greatest \(X\)” or “there is a least \(X\)”?
Prove or disprove: There is a least prime number.
Prove or disprove: There is a greatest integer.
Approach 1, De Morgan’s and universal generalization:
Approach 2, proof by contradiction:
Extra examples: Prove or disprove that \(\mathbb{N}\), \(\mathbb{Q}\) each have a least and a greatest element.
Definition: Greatest common divisor Let \(a\) and \(b\) be integers, not both zero. The largest integer \(d\) such that \(d\) is a factor of \(a\) and \(d\) is a factor of \(b\) is called the greatest common divisor of \(a\) and \(b\) and is denoted by \(gcd(~(a, b)~)\).
Why do we restrict to the situation where \(a\) and \(b\) are not both zero?
Calculate \(gcd(~(10,15)~)\)
Calculate \(gcd(~(10,20)~)\)
Claim: For any integers \(a,b\) (not both zero), \(gcd(~(a,b)~) \geq 1\).
Proof: Show that \(1\) is a common factor of any two integers, so since the gcd is the greatest common factor it is greater than or equal to any common factor.
Claim: For any positive integers \(a,b\), \(gcd(~(a,b)~) \leq a\) and \(gcd( ~(a,b)~) \leq b\).
Proof Using the definition of gcd and the fact that factors of a positive integer are less than or equal to that integer.
Claim: For any positive integers \(a,b\), if \(a\) divides \(b\) then \(gcd(~(a,b)~) = a\).
Proof Using previous claim and definition of gcd.
Claim: For any positive integers \(a,b,c\), if there is some integer \(q\) such that \(a = bq + c\), \[gcd(~(a,b)~) = gcd (~(b,c)~)\] Proof Prove that any common divisor of \(a,b\) divides \(c\) and that any common divisor of \(b,c\) divides \(a\).
Lemma: For any integers \(p, q\) (not both zero), \(gcd \left(~ \left(~\frac{p}{gcd(~(p,q)~)}, \frac{q}{gcd(~(p,q)~)} ~\right) ~\right) = 1\) . In other words, can reduce to relatively prime integers by dividing by gcd.
Proof:
Let \(x\) be arbitrary positive integer and assume that \(x\) is a factor of each of \(\frac{p}{gcd(~(p,q)~)}\) and \(\frac{q}{gcd(~(p,q)~)}\). This gives integers \(\alpha\), \(\beta\) such that \[\alpha x = \frac{p}{gcd(~(p,q)~)} \qquad \qquad \beta x = \frac{q}{gcd(~(p,q)~)}\] Multiplying both sides by the denominator in the RHS: \[\alpha x \cdot gcd(~(p,q)~)= p \qquad \qquad \beta x \cdot gcd(~(p,q)~)= q\] In other words, \(x \cdot gcd(~(p,q)~)\) is a common divisor of \(p, q\). By definition of \(gcd\), this means \[x \cdot gcd (~(p,q)~) \leq gcd (~(p,q)~)\] and since \(gcd(~(p,q)~)\) is positive, this means, \(x \leq 1\).
For a set of numbers \(X\), how do you formalize “there is a greatest \(X\)” or “there is a least \(X\)”?
Prove or disprove: There is a least prime number.
Prove or disprove: There is a greatest integer.
Approach 1, De Morgan’s and universal generalization:
Approach 2, proof by contradiction:
Extra examples: Prove or disprove that \(\mathbb{N}\), \(\mathbb{Q}\) each have a least and a greatest element.
Definition: Greatest common divisor Let \(a\) and \(b\) be integers, not both zero. The largest integer \(d\) such that \(d\) is a factor of \(a\) and \(d\) is a factor of \(b\) is called the greatest common divisor of \(a\) and \(b\) and is denoted by \(gcd(~(a, b)~)\).
Why do we restrict to the situation where \(a\) and \(b\) are not both zero?
Calculate \(gcd(~(10,15)~)\)
Calculate \(gcd(~(10,20)~)\)
Claim: For any integers \(a,b\) (not both zero), \(gcd(~(a,b)~) \geq 1\).
Proof: Show that \(1\) is a common factor of any two integers, so since the gcd is the greatest common factor it is greater than or equal to any common factor.
Claim: For any positive integers \(a,b\), \(gcd(~(a,b)~) \leq a\) and \(gcd( ~(a,b)~) \leq b\).
Proof Using the definition of gcd and the fact that factors of a positive integer are less than or equal to that integer.
Claim: For any positive integers \(a,b\), if \(a\) divides \(b\) then \(gcd(~(a,b)~) = a\).
Proof Using previous claim and definition of gcd.
Claim: For any positive integers \(a,b,c\), if there is some integer \(q\) such that \(a = bq + c\), \[gcd(~(a,b)~) = gcd (~(b,c)~)\] Proof Prove that any common divisor of \(a,b\) divides \(c\) and that any common divisor of \(b,c\) divides \(a\).
Lemma: For any integers \(p, q\) (not both zero), \(gcd \left(~ \left(~\frac{p}{gcd(~(p,q)~)}, \frac{q}{gcd(~(p,q)~)} ~\right) ~\right) = 1\) . In other words, can reduce to relatively prime integers by dividing by gcd.
Proof:
Let \(x\) be arbitrary positive integer and assume that \(x\) is a factor of each of \(\frac{p}{gcd(~(p,q)~)}\) and \(\frac{q}{gcd(~(p,q)~)}\). This gives integers \(\alpha\), \(\beta\) such that \[\alpha x = \frac{p}{gcd(~(p,q)~)} \qquad \qquad \beta x = \frac{q}{gcd(~(p,q)~)}\] Multiplying both sides by the denominator in the RHS: \[\alpha x \cdot gcd(~(p,q)~)= p \qquad \qquad \beta x \cdot gcd(~(p,q)~)= q\] In other words, \(x \cdot gcd(~(p,q)~)\) is a common divisor of \(p, q\). By definition of \(gcd\), this means \[x \cdot gcd (~(p,q)~) \leq gcd (~(p,q)~)\] and since \(gcd(~(p,q)~)\) is positive, this means, \(x \leq 1\).
Term | Notation Example(s) | We say in English … |
---|---|---|
sequence | \(x_1, \ldots, x_n\) | A sequence \(x_1\) to \(x_n\) |
summation | \(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i\) or \(\displaystyle{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}\) | The sum of the terms of the sequence \(x_1\) to \(x_n\) |
all reals | \(\mathbb{R}\) | The (set of all) real numbers (numbers on the number line) |
all integers | \(\mathbb{Z}\) | The (set of all) integers (whole numbers including negatives, zero, and positives) |
all positive integers | \(\mathbb{Z}^+\) | The (set of all) strictly positive integers |
all natural numbers | \(\mathbb{N}\) | The (set of all) natural numbers. Note: we use the convention that \(0\) is a natural number. |
piecewise rule definition | \(f(x) = \begin{cases} x & \text{if~}x \geq 0 \\ -x & \text{if~}x<0\end{cases}\) | Define \(f\) of \(x\) to be \(x\) when \(x\) is nonnegative and to be \(-x\) when \(x\) is negative |
function application | \(f(7)\) | \(f\) of \(7\) or \(f\) applied to \(7\) or the image of \(7\) under \(f\) |
\(f(z)\) | \(f\) of \(z\) or \(f\) applied to \(z\) or the image of \(z\) under \(f\) | |
\(f(g(z))\) | \(f\) of \(g\) of \(z\) or \(f\) applied to the result of \(g\) applied to \(z\) | |
absolute value | \(\lvert -3 \rvert\) | The absolute value of \(-3\) |
square root | \(\sqrt{9}\) | The non-negative square root of \(9\) |
To define sets:
To define a set using roster method, explicitly list its elements. That is, start with \(\{\) then list elements of the set separated by commas and close with \(\}\).
To define a set using set builder definition, either form “The set of all \(x\) from the universe \(U\) such that \(x\) is ..." by writing \[\{x \in U \mid ...x... \}\] or form “the collection of all outputs of some operation when the input ranges over the universe \(U\)" by writing \[\{ ...x... \mid x\in U \}\]
We use the symbol \(\in\) as “is an
element of” to indicate membership in a set.
Example sets: For each of the following,
identify whether it’s defined using the roster method or set builder
notation and give an example element.
\(\{ -1, 1\}\)
\(\{0, 0 \}\)
\(\{-1, 0, 1 \}\)
\(\{(x,x,x) \mid x \in \{-1,0,1\}
\}\)
\(\{ \}\)
\(\{ x \in \mathbb{Z} \mid x \geq 0
\}\)
\(\{ x \in \mathbb{Z} \mid x > 0
\}\)
\(\{\texttt{A},\texttt{C},\texttt{U},\texttt{G}\}\)
\(\{\texttt{A}\texttt{U}\texttt{G},
\texttt{U}\texttt{A}\texttt{G}, \texttt{U}\texttt{G}\texttt{A},
\texttt{U}\texttt{A}\texttt{A}\}\)